.png)
Loan-Level Price Adjustments, or LLPAs, are incremental rate adjustments lenders clearly add (or subtract) from the base rate depending on specific attributes of your loan scenario. These adjustments systematically reflect and quantify risk factors such as creditworthiness, leverage, property characteristics, loan purpose, amortization type, and prepayment structure. Essentially the DSCR Lender is assigning a number (typically also in 0.125 or “eighth” increments) to add or subtract from the base premiums to price the risk of each loan. The “risk” for the lender in this case is a general subjective measure primarily the risk of default as well as in cases of default, risk of not recovering the amount due through foreclosure and/or personal recourse.
While there are three primary factors that drive DSCR loan pricing, LTV, DSCR, and credit score (FICO), the LTV ratio is typically the single most influential metric. That's because LTV clearly captures not only the primary "default risk" (the risk of a borrower failing to repay the loan), but also the crucial secondary risk: the likelihood that the lender can recover the loan balance through foreclosure if a default does occur.
Because LTV measures both of these critical risks simultaneously, DSCR Lenders generally structure their rate sheets and pricing tools around two-way matrices with LTV buckets plotted as columns. This approach allows LTV to consistently remain the most impactful factor when pricing and determining eligibility for DSCR loans.
Below, we’ll outline each LLPA category utilized by DSCR Lenders to generate pricing and demonstrate how lenders use these adjustments to arrive at customized DSCR Loan quotes.
The first LLPA “matrix” utilized by most DSCR Lenders is one that plots the qualifying credit score (FICO) with LTV. Typically, once a base rate and assigned base premium are chosen, the next step will be to either add or subtract an LLPA based on the combination of LTV bucket and FICO bucket. This LLPA addition/subtraction will be found in a two-way matrix by finding the value assigned to where the row for the applicable FICO bucket sits and the column for the applicable LTV bucket, as illustrated below.
While this is just an example of what a typical DSCR Lender’s FICO/LTV LLPA matrix will might look like, there are several takeaways that are likely representative of what you’ll find with most DSCR Lenders. But know that each one will be likely different. This means that specific FICO/LTV combinations may be treated better or worse and differently and in multiple ways from multiple lenders! However, there are some general takeaways from the FICO/LTV matrices that are going to be universal among DSCR Lenders.
In general, the higher the credit score and lower the LTV, the better pricing. This will typically be in “positive territory” (i.e. the LLPAs are a positive number, “adding” premium to the overall DSCR Loan “price”). As illustrated in the FICO/LTV matrix, the higher in the table (i.e. higher credit score) and closer to the left (i.e. lower LTV ratio), the better pricing adjustment, or “positive LLPA,” as this adjusts for the lower lender risk in making low leverage loans to high-credit borrowers.
Another takeaway is that DSCR LLPA pricing matrices are typically not linear, meaning that the benefits will be more pronounced for the very low LTV buckets (such as less than 55.0% LTVs) and for really strong credit (like 760+). This also works in reverse, with big negative hits (i.e. negative LLPA adjustments, “subtracting” premium from the DSCR Loan “price”) for high LTV loans (like 75.01-80.0%) and poor credit. It’s not a smooth spectrum, with drops or jumps in pricing when you get to the extremes.
Sometimes, the negative LLPA adjustments at the extremes may be so punishing that it makes pricing almost impossible even if a loan with some terms is technically offered. An example of this is when some DSCR Lenders offer an 85.0% LTV option, which will technically be available, will have such a large negative LLPA (such as a negative 200 basis point adjustment at that LTV bucket), that very few (if any) actually DSCR Loans could qualify with the needed pricing. Sometimes, this could be characterized as a “bait and switch” scheme, where 85.0% LTV is advertised, but the needed rate to accommodate for a proper risk premium is so high, investors are forced into lower LTV options.
Also, besides just LLPA adjustments that affect premiums, DSCR Lenders will usually have additional restrictions such as LTV limits in addition to pricing adjustments when it comes to handling risk factors for DSCR Loans. This is illustrated in the sample FICO/LTV matrix above, as certain combinations of FICO and LTV, (such as the 70.01-75.0% LTV and 660-679 FICO combination in the bottom right corner), have a “N/A” rather than a premium adder or subtractor. This serves to show in the pricing tool that the DSCR Lender doesn’t actually offer DSCR Loans at that leverage point for borrowers with poor credit: it’s a visual representation of a 70.0% LTV maximum for borrowers with a qualifying credit score of less than 680 (in our example FICO/LTV matrix).
The next typical LLPA for DSCR Loans is for the DSCR Ratio, which again like FICO, is plotted in a two-way matrix against LTV as illustrated in an example DSCR/LTV LLPA Matrix below.
Q: What is the Minimum DSCR Required to Qualify for a DSCR Loan? (Can I Get a Loan with a DSCR Below 1?)
A: DSCR Lender minimums vary, many require at least 1.00x, meaning property income exactly covers PITIA. However, some lenders allow DSCRs as low as 0.75x or even set no minimum (“no ratio” DSCR Loans). Keep in mind, though: DSCR loans under 1.00x usually carry significantly higher interest rates and have stricter maximum LTV limits, typically capped around 65.0%.
Before diving into the next LLPA adjustments, it is valuable to make sure a few more complex DSCR Loan pricing concepts are well understood: Loan “scenarios” and “overlays.” What’s important to understand is that each loan is generally thought of by DCSR Lenders as a “scenario” in which the entire set of risk parameters and individual deal factors are considered together. This scenario concept is important to understand because limits and restrictions on loan terms are often implemented both at the program level and the scenario level. Program Level limits are best thought of as the DSCR lender’s overall maximum or minimum restrictions that are a hard line in what is offered to any borrower. Examples of program level limits are an overall LTV maximum of 80.0% or FICO minimum of 640.
Distinct from overarching program-level limits, scenario-level limits go a step further, and are maximums or minimums applied in conjunction with specific factors, i.e. will only apply some of the time and are dependent on specific deal factors. Think of it as similar to “if then” logical functions, that require an “if” for the limit (maximum or minimum, or the “then” to kick in). For example, representative scenario-level limits include some examples from the FICO/LTV and DSCR/LTV matrices above; including if DSCR <0.75x, then the LTV maximum that applies is 65.0%. You can see this in the DSCR/LTV pricing matrix, as each of the LTV buckets with LTVs greater than 65.0% (65.01-70.0%, 70.01-75.0%, 75.01-80.0%) in the DSCR <0.75x row doesn’t have a pricing adjustment, rather uses “N/A” to show its not eligible as it’s above the LTV maximum for this specific scenario (i.e. DSCR ratios under 0.75x).
While scenario-level pricing limits can be a bit complex, once you understand the concept, it is fairly straightforward, especially when expressed neatly in a two-way matrix with clearly noted “N/A” entries for tripped scenario limits. While almost all DSCR Lenders will have program-level and scenario-level limits, many Lenders will also go a step further in scenario-level limits, in which limits are determined based on more than two factors in combination, that won’t fit neatly into a two-way matrix like simple FICO/LTV or DSCR/LTV scenario limits.
When there are more than two factors creating a specific scenario limit, these are called overlays and are significantly harder to display on a rate sheet or for borrowers to decipher. Note that these are often integrated on pricing sheets, but overlays affect eligibility rather than pricing adjustments (premium adders/subtractors). An example overlay would be adding in the loan purpose factor to the FICO/LTV limits. The most common DSCR lender overlay is that each of the specific scenario LTV maximums is reduced by 5% or one bucket when the loan purpose is a cash-out refinance (versus acquisition or rate-term refi). For example, expanding on the scenario-level limit discussed above (“if DSCR <0.75x, then the LTV maximum that applies is 65.0%”), this would potentially apply to DSCR Loans for acquisitions or rate-term refinances, while for cash-out refinances, the LTV maximum if the DSCR is <0.75x would be 60.0%, 5% less than for other loan purpose types).
While some lenders may reconfigure matrices to have more than three or four factors mapped together, others with overlays may put these as footnotes or just rely on representatives to discuss and communicate separately. This obviously creates some additional confusion for borrowers pursuing DSCR Loans and understanding overlays is a crucial step towards truly mastering DSCR loan financing strategies and comprehending all the options available.
These concepts are particularly important since while most DSCR Lenders will have “rate sheets” that display all the matrices and specific LLPA adjustments, the more granular scenario-level adjustments and overlays that can’t be neatly displayed on a matrix also affect pricing. There is variety among DSCR Lenders on how these scenario-specific limits and overlays are displayed; with some lenders utilizing robust footnotes and sections; with others not having these wrinkles clearly included.
For DSCR Loans there can even be restrictions on specific scenarios like cash-out refinance seasoning requirements or granular experience requirements that aren’t easy to quantify or fit on a rate sheet. It’s a challenging balance between simplicity and ease with full detail-inclusive without a necessarily “right answer” for best practice, but a well-informed borrower should be able to ask and clarify any questions with the right understanding of DSCR Loan pricing mechanics.
Past the main two matrices covering combinations of the “major factors” in DSCR Loan pricing (FICO/LTV and DSCR/LTV), the remainder of the LLPAs are more of a mix between pricing adjustments and overlays. Like FICO and DSCR, a lot of these LLPA factors are also plotted in a two-way matrix in which the pricing adjustment or overlay restriction is different based on associated LTV bucket. However, this is not universal among either LLPAs or lender (some lenders can have simple adjustments or overlays for some factors that are not varied by LTV for example).
Past LTV, FICO and DSCR, the Loan Purpose LLPA is likely the most impactful on DSCR loan rate and terms than any other secondary factor (outside of potentially prepayment penalties, however prepayment penalty LLPAs typically affect pricing only, without LTV-related restrictions or overlays).
The most common Loan Purpose LLPAs among DSCR lenders are a negative premium adjustment (subtractor) for cash-out refinances with no adjustments if the loan purpose is acquisition or rate-term refinance. Usually cash-out refinances will have a negative 5% LTV scenario-level overlay versus acquisitions or rate-term refinances where the LTV maximum bucket for any given scenario is one below (or 5% less) than otherwise. While this may vary among lenders and within different scenarios or buckets, this treatment is common and fairly universal among lenders.
Cash-Out Refinances tend to have worse pricing (higher rate or fees) and lower LTV limits than Acquisitions or even Rate-Term Refinances primarily due to the less certainty over value (at least in regards to acquisitions, where a market value is more substantiated through the purchase transaction itself, versus an estimate only on a refinance) as well as lender protections against fraud, investor psychology and historical data.
The worse pricing for a cash-out refinance (vs. purchase or rate-term refinance) is typically felt as a mix of LTV restriction overlay (one bucket lower) and LLPA premium subtractor (typically 0.25 to 0.50 worse). Since premium subtractors are generally equivalent to half as much rate effect, that means that cash-out refinances generally have higher rates by only around 0.125% to 0.250% as well as a 5% lower LTV limit; each of which is relatively minor by itself, but creates a more meaningful unfavorable effect in combination.
Q: How Much Higher is the Interest Rate on a DSCR Cash-Out Refinance vs. a Rate-and-Term Refinance?
A: DSCR Cash-Out Refinance loans typically have interest rates 0.125% to 0.25% higher than Rate-and-Term refinances, along with a maximum LTV reduction of around 5%. This difference occurs because lenders view cash-out refinances as slightly riskier due to valuation uncertainty, fraud risk and historical data.
Loan Size LLPAs can vary significantly from lender to lender, with the “buckets” chosen as well as low level and high-level bounds (i.e. minimums and maximums) showing significant diversity among lenders. While some lenders may do significant pricing (premium adders/subtractors) adjustments for Loan Size, the majority of DSCR lenders’ LLPAs for Loan Size overlays only affect LTV restrictions or have minor pricing adjustments only at the very top or very bottom loan size buckets.
The primary concern around loan size is aiming for property value (directly connected to loan amount) in the “goldilocks zone” of not too big, not too small. The medium range of property values (and loan amounts) includes the largest and most liquid market (pool of potential buyers and renters) that reduce risk the most, with much higher valuation risk at the bottom (indicative of a struggling market or lower-quality homes) or at the top (more volatile values, much smaller pool of buyers that can afford multi-million dollar homes).
Here is an example Loan Size / LTV matrix showing LTV bucket overlays and restrictions:
You might have noticed that the prepayment penalty structure fields in the above chart may have an unfamiliar format. This format aims to be more precise and accurate than how the structures were described in previous sections (like “5/4/3/2/1” or “5/5/5”). It is the shorthand for also how most lenders communicate them. in shorthand. The structure utilized in the matrix, which we’ll decipher below, is more in line with how prepayment penalties are described or “coded” by commercial real estate lenders, specifically for loans in the CMBS (commercial mortgage backed security market). It is also a better way to describe the exact provisions and a better way to think about the loans for real estate investors as well as everyone else involved in the industry.
Prepayment penalty provisions, annotated with two aspects, duration and penalty, are sometimes thought of as marked in years (i.e. the “5” in 5/4/3/2/1 referring to the first year) or months. But duration is better thought of in terms of payment dates. In the formatting in the table above, note that the numbers within the parentheses represent months or more precisely, monthly payments. Since all (or nearly all) DSCR Loans have loan terms of 30 years or 360 months, all of the numbers within the parentheses add up neatly to 360, or the total amount of payment dates on the loan. The numbers or fields refer to the penalties charged, followed by the number of months or payment dates that apply. The letter “O” is used to stand for “Open” period, such that an “O(300)” denotes that for 300 payment periods (in most cases, the final 300 payment dates of the loan term), the loan is open to prepayment with zero penalty.
So to read a prepayment penalty “string” in this coding/formatting methodology, a 5%(12),4%(12),3%(12),2%(12),1%(12),O(300), means over the first 12 monthly payment dates, prepayment would come with a 5% fee, the next 12 payment dates would be 4% fee, 3% fee for the next 12, 2% for the next 12, 1% for the next 12 and then open, or zero prepayment penalties for the final 300 payment dates. While a little lengthier, this format provides better insight and clarity, mainly because it properly demonstrates that there is no prepayment penalty applied for the final 300 payments of the loan, which isn’t always intuitive, especially for newer investors, who don’t realize the loan term is 30 years (not five) and that no prepayment penalty applies for the vast majority of the term!
In addition, this formatting for the “California-Style” prepayment penalty provision structure, adding the extra text showing that 20% is freely prepayable every year is critical, as it significantly increases freedom and flexibility for borrowers to prepay part of their loans without penalty, while still getting the pricing benefits of extended prepayment penalty provision durations. Even the most experienced borrowers and even DSCR Lenders and mortgage brokers often forget this highly competitive structure option.
Also note that some states have regulations that require DSCR Lenders to only offer non-standard prepayment penalty structures that don’t fit in normal rate sheet LLPAs. Some examples include states like Michigan in which there is a maximum of 1% fee for a maximum of three years, but that structure of 1%(36),O(324) is unlikely to be chosen for any other state and would be excessive for most rate sheets. In these cases, most DSCR Lenders would allow only 1%(12),O(348) that would both fit the regulation and a standard LLPA option on the rate sheet, but some flexible DSCR Lenders may be willing to create a tailored structure for better pricing. If you are an investor buying in a state with unique prepayment penalty regulations, it couldn’t hurt to ask what might be available!
There are additional LLPA categories that can also affect pricing for DSCR Loans. We’ll cover the rest here in brief, as each of the following either have a smaller overall effect (like a small adder/subtractor to premium resulting in a rate change of 0.25% or less) or only show up rarely (like pricing for loans to borrowers with recent serious credit issues like mortgage delinquencies or bankruptcies) or both.
Choosing Fully Amortizing versus Partial-IO is always an interesting LLPA adjustment on DSCR lender rate sheets because while there is usually a negative premium adjustment (subtractor) of around -0.500 to -0.750 resulting in an interest rate ~0.25% to 0.375% higher, since the monthly payment doesn’t include principal, even with the higher rate, the monthly payment is otherwise typically lower! Because the borrower doesn’t pay down any principal over the first ten years of the term (even if it’s only a small portion on Fully Amortizing loans), usually, but not always, DSCR Lenders will also have a 5% LTV overlay reduction if choosing Partial-IO options, such as a maximum of 75.0% LTV on scenarios that would otherwise have an 80.0% LTV max.
Although the vast majority of DSCR Loans are 30-year fixed rate structures, for borrowers that choose Hybrid (Fixed to ARM) rate structure options, typically four options are offered by most DSCR Lenders in 2026: “5/6” “5/1” “7/6” or “7/1.” Because of the combination of a market with stubbornly elevated interest rates, clear expectations of rates falling in the medium to long term (~5-7 years) and a structural rate floor equal to initial rate that protects any downside, the pricing benefit offered by DSCR Lenders for these Hybrid (Fixed to ARM) options typically are extremely minor, typically LLPAs of only 0.125 to 0.250 at most. As such, choosing this rate structure only results in a maximum rate change of just 0.125% or small savings on closing fee. For this reason, these structures remain rare and without much impact, but can be utilized by investors that crunch the numbers to every dollar and can be particularly useful for situations when a DSCR ratio is so close to a 1.00x qualifying hurdle that every basis point counts. Additionally, as market rates change, the beneficial premiums for this structure may become more significant in the years ahead, as this LLPA is most affected by overall market conditions and the most likely LLPA to change significantly over time and into the future.
Q: How Can I Improve My DSCR to Qualify if It’s Too Low?
A: The most effective way to improve your DSCR is by lowering the Loan-to-Value (LTV). A lower LTV means a smaller loan amount, which reduces your monthly mortgage payment, the denominator in the DSCR formula. Plus, lower LTVs often qualify for better interest rates due to favorable Loan-Level Price Adjustments (LLPAs), further boosting the DSCR Ratio. Additionally, if your DSCR is just below the required threshold (e.g., 0.97x when you need 1.00x), small adjustments can make a big difference. Choosing a Partial Interest-Only option and/or a Hybrid (Fixed-to-ARM) structure may reduce your rate slightly, often enough to push your DSCR over the line.
While some real estate investors are surprised that they are still eligible for DSCR Loans with significant recent credit issues like multiple 30+ mortgage-related delinquencies or bankruptcies and foreclosures on their credit reports, it can make more sense when understanding the harsh LLPA penalties they will incur in terms of elevated rate and/or closing fees in their quotes.
Mortgage Lates (30+ day delinquencies on real-estate related debt to a borrower or guarantor) are often formatted by DSCR Lenders in a confusing manner. Usually expressed as a series of three numbers separated by an “x,” it describes the number or frequency of delinquencies, the magnitude of the delinquency (i.e. counted in increments of 30 days – such as a payment was 30 days late, 60 days late, 90 days late, etc. It is important to note that payments that are late, but late for less than 30 days aren’t considered late by DSCR lenders), and the delinquency lookback period is counted in increments of months (i.e. how many months back do the late payments “count” for).
To illustrate, a “1x30x12” would mean that the borrower/guarantor had one instance of a 30-day late payment (but importantly, none that exceeded 60 or more days) in the last 12 months. A code of “Multiplex30x12” would indicate multiple instances of 30-day lates in the last 12 months from the credit report date, but no 60-day or worse lates. These, along with a “None” or equivalent, might be the three options available on a DSCR Lender’s rate sheet. In these cases, it would likely be safe to assume that the DSCR Lender does not consider mortgage lates on the credit report more than 12 months in the past and also that any borrower or guarantor with a single 60, 90 or greater mortgage delinquency is fully ineligible. It also indicates, that “multiple” can cover between two and eleven 30+ instances, and these would be treated the same.
While this “shorthand” is pretty confusing and many DSCR Lenders would be better served with clearer coding and better clarity, unfortunately, as of now, this is the common industry standard terminology. But fortunately for you, if you are reading this, you can have an upper hand in understanding the most complex and confusing aspects of a DSCR rate sheet like a true expert!
The formatting or rate sheet coding for credit events is a little less confusing but can be unintuitive for investors at first glance. It can be formatted differently from lender to lender, but sometimes it will just be labeled straightforwardly as “credit events” or abbreviated to include each of the credit event types (which will typically have the same LLPA) such as “BK/FC/SS/DIL”" standing for “Bankruptcy/Foreclosure/Short Sale/Deed-In-Lieu”). Most DSCR Lenders will allow one of these (including only one in a category, i.e. two separate foreclosures count as “multiple”) in the last four to seven years, with any multiple instances of these rendering the borrower fully ineligible. Some lenders will have different credit event LLPA penalties based on how far in the past it occurred, such as within one year ago, between one and two years ago, between two and three years ago, between three and four years ago, with any events greater than four years since resolution not an issue.
Q: My DSCR lender says BK/FC/SS/DIL must be 4 years. What does that mean?
A: This means you must be at least 4 years past major credit events to qualify. Here’s what each abbreviation stands for: BK = Bankruptcy, FC = Foreclosure, SS = Short Sale, DIL = Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. When a lender says “BK/FC/SS/DIL must be 4 years,” it means the event must have been completed (discharged, finalized, or closed) at least 48 months ago. This is a common seasoning requirement in DSCR Loan guidelines and affects your eligibility regardless of current credit score.
Enough about formatting and definitions, what exactly are the pricing penalties for mortgage lates and credit events? These will vary from lender to lender, both in terms of what is allowed and what’s not, but here are some representative DSCR Lender LLPAs for mortgage lates and credit events. Note that the absence of “credit events” or “mortgage lates” is typically just incorporated as not affecting the rate computation (or a 0.000 premium adjustment) and while other overlays and restrictions are rare, some lenders may implement these too (such as DSCR minimums or lower LTV maximums).
Representative Mortgage Lates LLPAs:
Representative Credit Events LLPAs:
Note, there are frequently changing and significant differences among DSCR Lenders for credit event and mortgage lates LLPA treatment, especially as the penalties themselves can vary quite a bit in severity. Investors with significant blemishes on their recent real estate credit history are often the best-served borrowers from shopping around and reviewing all the available options!
While most DSCR Lenders that offer DSCR Loans in rural and/or declining markets or loans that are used (and qualified) as short term rentals just use overlay restrictions like lower LTV limits rather than actual pricing adjustments, there is also some significant lender diversity in these areas. While LTV overlays are most common for these situations, some lenders might instead (or in conjunction) offer negative premium adjustments (subtractors) to require higher rates and/or fees for loans where these market or usage factors are applicable. The range of these negative premium adjustments if applicable would typically be moderate, somewhere between -0.250 and -0.750, but with LTV overlays much stricter, such as 65.0% maximum LTVs for rural properties common for example.
Finally, for advanced real estate investors that want to know the smallest but typical and relevant LLPA adjustments, there are a few final items that can affect DSCR Loan pricing. While many lenders will require automated ACH payments, some DSCR Lenders will give an option to manually pay and not set up ACH payments automatically at closing. If this option is offered (waiving ACH payment requirements), typically it comes with a -0.125 negative LLPA (i.e. a rate higher by 0.075% or a higher closing fee by a minimal 0.125%). Similar to ACH, most DSCR Lenders require the borrower to allow the lender/servicer to collect payments for property taxes and property insurance (i.e. Escrows) however some will allow the borrower to handle this piece instead. In these cases, like ACH, if borrowers choose not to have escrows handled by the lender, a similar minimal pricing hit of 0.250 or 0.125 negative LLPA will likely apply.
Up Next: Putting It All Together: LLPA Adjustment DSCR Loan Pricing Example, see how an example DSCR Loan transaction gets priced from beginning (Rate Stack) to end (Quote Options), with how the LLPA adjustments work in between!
© 2026 Harpoon Capital, LLC. All Rights Reserved. WARNING: Unauthorized distribution, copying, or sharing of this guide is a violation of U.S. Federal Law and is punishable by civil penalties of up to $150,000 per violation. We aggressively enforce our intellectual property rights.
